Journal of Korea TAPPI. 30 December 2015. 5-21
https://doi.org/10.7584/ktappi.2015.47.6.005

ABSTRACT


MAIN

1. Introduction

The annual global production of cellulose has been estimated to 7.5×1010 tonnes1), which corresponds to 3×1010 tonnes annual production of carbon. In order to provide a climate change perspective this can be compared with the total annual carbon emission from fossil materials, which amounts to 9×1010 tonnes.2) Hence, the world forests have a considerable positive effect on the global carbon cycle. It is, therefore understandable, that in spite of the fact that cellulose chemistry is well known, there are great contemporary efforts to develop new types of sustainable materials from cellulose such as cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanofibrils, cellulose microfibrills and the like. This effort encompasses top-down methods using enzymatic or/and chemical/physical methodologies to break down wood and other plant materials as well as bottom-up procedures for producing cellulose from certain bacteria.

The nomenclature for nanocellulosic materials is not entirely uniform but there are three broad categories of these materials3): microfibrillar cellulose (MFC) or nanofibrillar cellulose (NFC), currently abbreviated CNF (cellulose nanofibrils), nanocrystalline materials (NCC), now also abbreviated CNC and bacterial nanocellulose (BNC). Typical CNF materials have a fibril diameter from 3-60 nm and up to several microns in length. The span is large, ranging from 3 nm for TEMPO-oxidized fibrils to 60 nm for fibrils created without any chemical pre-treatments before communition of the fibres. The diameter of NCC also ranges form 3-60 nm in diameter, but the material has a shorter length in the order of 100-250 nm. Hence, there are numerous types of nanocellulosic materials that are potentially suitable for different industrial applications.

Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) possess several exciting properties.4-7) These materials are biodegradable, can be produced from a variety of sustainable resources, and are characterized by their high specific strength and stiffness values. Furthermore, CNF-based films display low density, porosity, and thermal expansion coefficient, together with high transparency and high strength. Hence, CNF may potentially be used in numerous industrial applications.

In this communication, some of the high-volume applications of CNF are presented and the modes of actions of the materials in the applications are described. In this context, the predicted market sizes of CNF materials (in 5-10 years’ perspective) in each application are also included. The numbers are direct citations from the report of Cowie et al.8), who have based their estimations on among others compiled governmental data, financial data and survey articles. However, it is pointed out that the quotations define upper estimates of the market sizes of NFC; as the estimates of Cowie et al. refer to the total usage of nanocellulosic materials, which comprise not only CNF materials but also CNC and BNC materials.

2. Production of CNF materials from wood fibres

The manufacture of CNF materials goes back to the developments at ITT Rayonier in the late 1970s, but these researchers9,10) and researchers at the then STFI (now Innventia)11) concluded that the energy consumption was very high. Early studies11) at STFI in Stockholm, Sweden (now Innventia) estimated the energy consumption to around 30,000 kWh/tonne using a sulphite pulp. Later other investigators determined that between 12,000-70,000 kWh/tonne12,13) was required to make CNF from kraft pulps. The discrepancy between the different numbers is likely due to the fact that at the time of these investigations, there was no good definition for what constitutes a CNF material.

Another major problem related to the manufacturing of CNF was the clogging of homogenizers/microfluidizers already at low fibre consistencies. These two factors became major impediments for commercialisation of CNF at that time.

Interestingly, the original investigators at ITT-Rayonier found early that hydrophilic polymers such as cellulose derivatives and gums facilitated the mechanical delamination process, which can be traced down to the fact that such additives can decrease the flocculation of fibres, which is the primary factor responsible for clogging. Nevertheless, ITT-Rayonier abandoned further efforts in the CNF area. Their patent portfolio, see listings in e.g. Lindström et al.7) constitutes, however, an interesting pool of information, concentrated not only to food additives but also on various aspects of the manufacturing process.

There are several different routes to decrease the high energy consumption and alleviate the clogging tendency in CNF manufacturing:

  • A. Electrostatically induced swelling by subjecting pulps to oxidative pre-treatments or grafting procedures, or simply producing a pulp with a high amount of charged groups. In this category TEMPO-oxidation and carboxymethylation are the most used procedures by research investigators.

  • B. Mild acid- or enzymatic hydrolysis.

  • C. The use of stabilizers (deflocculants) as envisaged by the original investigators.

When dealing with delamination procedures based on pulps with a high charge content (route A) it is important to maximize the swelling of the pulps by having the charged groups in their ionized form (having monovalent counter-ions). Hydrolysis (route B) is employed as a mean to decrease the cell wall integrity of fibres, but may be detrimental to the strength properties of CNF materials if the hydrolysis is driven to sufficiently low degrees of polymerization of the fibres. In order to avoid flocculation (route C), the concept of crowding factor14) is useful:

[1]
N5×Cm×L2/ω

In the relation (Eq. 1), N denotes the crowding factor, Cm the mass concentration of fibres (%), L the fibre length in metre and ω the fibre coarseness (kg/m). According to the concept of Kerekes and Schell, a higher crowding factor is indicative of a higher tendency for fibre flocculation. As it can be seen in Eq. 1, the flocculation tendency decreases with decreasing fibre length and increasing the coarseness of the fibres. However, Eq. 1 does not take into account impact of the fibre-fibre friction on flocculation. It has been shown by Horvath and Lindström15) that the higher the surface charge is, the lesser becomes the friction between fibres, due to the increased electrostatic repulsion between the fibres. Hence, chemical treatments such as TEMPO-oxidation and carboxymethylation do not only decrease the cell wall cohesion, but also decrease the extent of flocculation, by which the clogging of homogenizers/microfluidizers can be alleviated. In this context it is noted that the same beneficial effects can be achieved by the physical grafting of polyelectrolyte chains (viz. carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)) onto fibres.16,17)

The carboxymethylation process (as a method to speed up refining) was discovered many years ago.18) It is interesting to note that carboxymethylation process is employed commercially today for the production of CMC.

The use of TEMPO-oxidation by using 2,2,6,6,-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (4-H-TEMPO) radicals before a mild mechanical treatment in blenders offers a unique way to delaminate fibres and make CNF.19) There are many publications on the use of 4-H-TEMPO to make CNF. 4-H-TEMPO is a water-soluble radical that can be used for the selective oxidation the primary C-6 hydroxyl groups of cellulose.20-22) The most widely publicized procedure to make CNF is the TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO system under slight alkaline conditions. Under such conditions, the aldehyde intermediates formed by oxidation can undergo beta-elimination reactions, which reduces the degree of polymerization of cellulose. But this degradation can be largely avoided today.23) Furthermore, TEMPO derivative nanofibrils with a high degree of polymerization can, however, be produced by using a 4-acetamido-TEMPO derivative, nanofibrils with a high degree of polymerization can be produced.24)

An enzymatic pre-treatment using endoglucanases together with pre-refining before communition has been found to have a beneficial effects to reduce the energy consumption to make CNF.25,26) Usually, the pulp is first pre-refined to enhance the accessibility of the fibre cell wall before the enzymatic treatment. Thereafter, the pre-treated fibres are extensively refined, as a mean to decrease the fibre length before homogenization (which often is the mechanical delamination process in the CNF manufacturing) in order to decrease the clogging tendency. It is believed that the enzymatic approach is suitable for large-scale manufacturing of inexpensive CNF materials that can be useful for wet-end applications in papermaking and coating applications. It is noted that the large-scale production of enzymatically pre-treated CNF was demonstrated by Innventia in 2011 by the inauguration of world’s first pilot plant for CNF-manufacturing.

Mechanical delamination of fibres can be achieved by an array of methodologies. Nanofibrillated cellulose (CNF) was for example produced by high pressure homogenizers.9,10) The two delamination methodologies to make CNF that occur frequently in the literature are high-pressure homogenizers and the so called microfluidizers.17,27) There are also other occurring methodologies, for example super grinding28-30), a type of refiner grinding, where wood fibres are forced through a gap between a rotary and a stationary discs. Cryo-crushing followed by disintegration and fibrillation has also been mentioned in the literature. 31-33)

Delamination with ball mills and ultra-sonification are other examples of methods for production of CNF.34) And recently, conventional extruders have also been used to produce CNF.35) It is noted that it is generally difficult to compare different delamination methods and to quantify the CNF quality vs. energy consumption. However, the accumulated experiences of Innventia have shown that CNF products based on homogenizers and microfluidizers display a more narrow size distribution (which is important in e.g. production of transparent films) as compared to when refiners are employed. Similar conclusions can be deducted from the contribution of Spence et al.13)

3. Large scale application areas of CNF: exemplified

3.1 Rheology characteristics of CNF materials

The potency of NFC as rheological modifiers was recognized already by the original inventors of the material.9,36,37) This property can be ascribed to the rich rheological behaviour of the material. The complexity of the rheological properties arises from by the earlier mentioned highly anisotropic nature (aspect ratio > 100) of the nanofibrils, which severely restricts the rotational and translational motion perpendicular to the axis of the nanofibrils, at much lower concentrations (< 0.1% (w/w))38,39) than observed for many spherically shaped particles (< 1% (w/w)).40)

Concentrated NFC systems are characterized by very high shear viscosities and display high shear thinning at increasing shearing10) (Fig. 1a). Furthermore, the materials display thixotropy41,42) (Fig. 1b). The rheological properties can be attractive in several industrial applications, but can also be a major impediment for the processing and application of the materials. The high viscosity that can be achieved at minute CNF amounts is advantageous in food applications for texturing purposes.43) The shear thinning and thixotropy properties are highly advantageous in e.g. coating applications44), which require the combination of several conflicting properties: an easy application, followed by an excellent surface coverage and levelling of the coating, which must not subsequently change. The properties are equally advantageous for concrete applications, in which the CNF component of the formulation arrests the concrete so that it can retain its form while solidifying.45) Today, modification of the rheology of food, coating and concrete formulations is achieved by large amounts of natural polymers and costly synthetic polymers, respectively.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f001.jpg
Fig. 1.

a) The shear viscosity of a CMC-grafted CNF as a function of CNF concentration, reproduced from Naderi et al.17); b) An example of thixotropic effects for an CNF system, reproduced from Iotti et al.41)

Cowie et al.8) have estimated the global consumption of nanocellulose as rheological modifiers in paint applications alone to be in the order of 200 thousand metric tonnes. However, it should be pointed out that the successful application of nanocelluloses requires the ability to control the rheology of the systems, which is currently not possible.46) Since, even though the rapid increase of the viscosity with the dry content of e.g. CNF is desirable (as described above), it also hinders the effective transportation of the material in piping; this is a major reason for the current production of CNF products with relatively low dry contents (< 5% (w/w)). It could be hypothesized that the high CNF-viscosity could possibly be moderated by taking advantage of the thixotropy-property of CNF. It may be envisaged that severe shearing of the material would decrease the viscosity under prolonged times enabling its processing. However, as it can be seen in Fig. 2, the original CNF viscosity is rapidly recovered when the high shearing process of the systems has been ceased. As it seems today, chemical approaches might be the key for the moderation of the CNF-viscosity.44,47)

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f002.jpg
Fig. 2.

The thixotropic properties of three different CNF grades. The viscosity values after 20 minutes denote the viscosities (which are recorded every second) of the systems as soon as the high shearing process has been ceased.

3.2 Concrete applications

There are publications that deal with the advantageous employment of CNF in concrete applications. For example, the patent application45) of the Finish company UPM makes use of the networking ability of CNF to modify the rheological properties of concrete formulations. Other publications48,49) reports of the strengthening of concrete composites with the use of nanocelluloses, which is proposed to occur by the ability of the high aspect ratio nanomaterials to bridge the micro cracks, and the networking ability of the same which leads to the dissipation of applied loads. On the other hand, Cao et al.50) have related the strengthening effect to the effective hydration of the entire cement composition by nanocelluloses. This occurs thanks to highly hydrated structure and the small size of the nanomaterial, which leads to the effectively channelling of water to the inner parts of the cement particles.

Cowie et al. predict that the world-wide cement industry (with an annual production of about 3 billion metric tonnes) will conservatively require 4 million metric tonnes of nanocellulose.8) The figure has been based on 0.5% (w/w) addition of nanocellulose, which has been shown to lead to a 20% increase in fracture toughness of cement.49)

3.3 Oil recovery applications

The potential application of nanocelluloses in oil-recovery has to be highlighted. Today, hydraulic fracturing for excavating oil involves the pumping of a viscous fluid (e.g. water together with concentrated amounts of synthetic surfactants) to generate high pressure for breaking the bed rock and enlarging existing fractures. Then, proppant particles are added to the fluid to form slurry that is pumped into the fracture to prevent it from closing when the pumping pressure is released. It has been proposed that nanocellusic materials viz. CNF, that display high viscosity and shear thinning, can function as green, economical flooding agents and proppant particles.51,52) The potential market is, however, difficult to predict at this moment in time.

3.4 Enhancement of paper properties with CNF

CNF materials are strength adjuvants that enhance the relative bonded area in paper sheets. Depending on the CNF size distribution the enhanced relative bonded area is expected to be increased on different structural levels in the paper sheet. The evolution of paper properties by the incorporation of CNF can be summarized as follows:

  • • Moderate increase in all strength properties such as tensile strength (particularly for chemical pulps)

  • • Lower light scattering and opacity

  • • Increased sheet density

  • • Increased hygroexpansion and drying-shrinkage

  • • Decreased air permeability of the paper

The paper properties develop similar to beating/refining, although the strain to failure and tensile energy absorption develop faster with CNF when compared at the same water retention value. Cellulose nanofibril materials have also a strong influence on the compression index (Fig. 3f). This may be understood from the combination of stiff fibrils (stabilizing buckling) and overlapping CNF fibrils, which further stabilize the paper sheet structure from local buckling. CNF materials have also a strong beneficial effect on the initial wet strength of paper.53)

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f003.jpg
Fig. 3.

The effects of enzymatically pre-treated CNF (prepared in a similar manner as Pääkkö et al.27) on the strength properties of freely and restrained dried paper sheets made from bleached softwood kraft pulp (unpublished results).

When making such broad generalizations, it must be remembered that CNF additions have considerable effects on the whole wet-end chemistry in terms of the need to have appropriate retention and dewatering agents, as the machine productivity otherwise would be affected in a negative way. Likewise the deposition of CNF to the stock components may as well be tailored. It has for instance been suggested that refining creates CNF tethered onto the surface of fibres can provide equivalent strength as when CNF is added to the suspension. However, the drainage effects that are achieved through the former route are superior to the latter, as the latter leads to the blocking of the water-flow through the web.54) In this context, it is noted that appropriate dispersion procedures of the CNF material are necessary as the critical networking concentration of CNF is very low.38) Today, to the best of the knowledge of the authors there exist no appropriate route for the effective dispersion of CNF in the furnish, which also combines economy and simplicity.

The negative effects of CNF on drainage55) and on press dewatering have been the subject of particular attention in the literature56,57), even though it has been claimed that papers containing CNF are easily dewatered using a single-nip shoe-press.58)

It is noted that the effects of CNF additions on paper properties have been reviewed59,60) and a representative sample of investigations have been collected in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sample of investigations on the effects of CNF materials on paper properties. The tensile strength property has been normalized to 5% CNF addition

Type of CNFFurnishRetention aidTensile strength gainReference
Bl. SW Sulphite pulp,
carboxymethylated pre-treated pulp, homog. 8 passes, pulp consist. : 2 %
Bl. SW Kraft,
slightly beaten and fines removed
Polyamide - amine epichlorohydrine (PAE),140 %Ahola et al. 200861)
Bl. HW kraft pulp,
enzymatic pretreatment
Bl. SW Kraft pulp,
beaten to 26 SR
Not disclosed39 %Da Silva Perez et al. 201062)
Bl. SW Sulphite pulp,
pre-refining and enzymatic pretreatment, homog. 4 passes, pulp consist.: 2%
Bl. SW Kraft pulp,
fines removed
C-PAM116 %Lindström and Naderi, 201546)
Bl. SW Kraft pulp,
no pre-treatment
Bl. SW KraftNot disclosed3%Osong et al. 201463)
Bl. Kraft Birch pulp,
Masuko supercollider, 5 passes, pulp consist. : 2%, no pretreatment
Bl. SW Kraft beaten to 19 SRMechanical retention 30-40 %21 %Manninen et al. 201164)
Bl. Birch Kraft pulp,
pre-refining, homog.
Bl. SW Kraft pulp, 18 SRVarious types8 %Taipale et al. 201055)
Bl. SW/HW Kraft pulp mixture,
pre-refining, 93 SR, homog.
Bl. SW/HW Kraft pulp2-component system50 %Kajanto and Kosonen 201258)
Bl. Eucalyptus Kraft pulp,
TEMPO pre-treated, homog. 6 passes, pulp consist.: 1-2 %
Bl. Eucalyptus Kraft pulp,
PFI-beaten, 1000 rev.
C-starch/silica sol38 %González et al. 201265)
Bl. Eucalyptus Kraft pulp,
TEMPO pre-treated, homog. 6 passes, pulp consist. :1-2 %
Bl. Eucalyptus Kraft pulpC-starch/silica sol85 %González et al. 201366)
Bl. HW kraft pulp,
enzymatic pre-treatment
Bl. HW Kraft,
beaten to 25 SR
Not disclosed42 %Da Silva Perez et al. 201062)
Kenaf bast fibres, enzymatic pre-treatment, refining, homog. 8 passesUnbl. HW kraft,
PFI-beaten to 40 SR
C-PAM17 %Rezayati-Charani et al. 201367)
Unbl. SW Kraft pulp, enzymatic pre-treatment, refining, homog. 8 passesUnbl. HW kraft, PFI-beaten to 40 SRC-PAM15 %Rezayati-Charani et al. 201367)
Bl. soda bagasse pulp,
enzymatic pre-treatment, homog. 5 passes, pulp consist.: 1%
Semi-bleached soda bagasse pulp, PFI-beatingC-PAM43 %Petroudy et al. 201468)
Bl. Birch Kraft pulp,
Fenton pre-treated, colloid mill delamination.
HT-CTMP, CSF 700 mlC-starch/silica sol35 %Hellström et al. 201469)
Bl. SW Kraft pulp,
no pre-treatment, homog. pulp consist.: 0.5 %
TMPRecycling of filtrate25 %Eriksen et al. 200812)
Bl. SW Kraft pulp,
no pre-treatment, homog. 5 passes, pulp consist.: 0.5 %
TMP + 15 % GCCRecycling of filtrate30 %Hii et al. 201256)
TEMPO pre-treated,
Brittish disintegrator, pulp cons.: 1.5 %
85 % TMP/15 % Bl. SW Kraft pulp. Handsheets with 45 % clayMechanical encapsulation of clay in CNF network33 %Guimond et al. 201070)

The manufacturing procedures of CNF materials have been indicated in this table, although it should be pointed out that the full information of the manufacturing details are lacking in many investigations. It must also be emphasized that it is difficult to assess if the communition process actually have resulted in CNF, as the characterization of CNF materials is generally difficult, with the exception of TEMPO-based CNF and CNC. Therefore, it is very difficult to make a detailed assessment of CNF materials on paper strength.

From the published data, the tensile strength gain at an addition level of 5 % CNF has been estimated. An inspection of the tensile strength gains in the table reveals that the highest strength gains are obtained with unbeaten pulps from which the fines have been removed. For heavily beaten pulps the strength gains are marginal.

Typical effects of CNF materials on the strength properties of an unbeaten bleached softwood kraft pulp are given in Fig. 3. The CNF material that was used was an enzymatically pre-treated CNF (prepared in the same manner as described in Pääkkö et al.27); the sheet strength data are given both for freely dried and sheets dried under restraint).

Finally, it is interesting to note that CNF materials also impose a strong effect on drying shrinkage64) resulting in a high strain to failure for freely dried papers.

It is noted that Cowie et al.8) have estimated the potential market for CNF in P&W and packaging materials to be around 1 million tonne.

3.5 CNF films and coatings in relation to paper applications

Films and coatings on paper and board are applied primarily in order to improve the printability. Good printability requires controlled interaction between the ink and the surface, rendering good surface smoothness and ink absorption. Coatings are commonly made from combinations of various pigments, latexes and /or proteins/starches, water retention agents and dispersion aids; the surface sizing materials are usually based on various starches or proteins. However, it is pointed out that none of these coating operations target the gas or oil/fat barrier properties of paper/board. Oil/fat barrier papers can be obtained by heavily beaten stocks together with chemical additives in so-called greaseproof papers, but such papers do not form a gas barrier for the paper/board. CNF materials do, however, show excellent gas barrier properties and mechanical integrity - provided that they are sufficiently delaminated.

The most effective communition technologies to obtain high-quality films are various homogenizers, as they can remove residual fibre fragments, which are difficult to remove using common papermaking refining technologies. It was early found71-73) that CNF materials had very low oxygen permeability. Fig. 4 shows the oxygen and water permeability of a carboxymethylated CNF film at 50 % RH. The oxygen permeability is very low, in the order of 1 (μ m cm3)/(m2 day kPa), which outperforms other organic barrier materials. The low oxygen barrier is due to the combination of high crystallinity and a high cohesive energy density of the CNF films. As biodegradable materials sorb moisture, their barrier properties are very sensitive to the relative humidity as shown in Fig. 5. As the RH is increased, the oxygen transmission increases orders of magnitude. As expected, the water vapour permeability of CNF films are similar to other biobarriers and does not constitute a useful water vapour barrier for most food packaging applications. Finally, it can be noted that the published barrier properties of various CNF materials have been compiled in several reviews.59,74,75)

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f004.jpg
Fig. 4.

Oxygen and water vapour permeability for different materials.74)

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f005.jpg
Fig. 5.

Oxygen transmission rate for NFC-films made from carboxymethylated CNF as a function of humidity.73)

Understandably, the core application of barrier materials falls in the domain of food packaging. 76-78) Large-scale packaging applications require a flexible high-performance gas/oil barrier with good mechanical integrity. Such properties are important for food packaging films, laminates and coatings and there are several reviews of this field available.59,60,74,75)

Coating processes are dominated by post-metering type of equipment. First, the coating colour is applied using roll coaters, short-dwell coaters or jet applicators. Post-metering is done by the application of a blade, rod or air-knife. Other alternatives are spray coating, curtain and extrusion coating, and spot/pattern coating applications. Foam coatings has recently been suggested to be used for CNF coating applications.79)

Coatings of CNF onto paper/board show a very high CNF hold-out (see Fig. 6). For simpler applications than barrier applications such as lint prevention or surface strength, very small amounts of CNF have been shown to give excellent properties. 80)

Free-standing films may be produced by film-casting or by technologies akin to papermaking procedures. There are, however, several processing challenges in making coatings or free-standing films, owing to the high viscosity and the slow dewatering of CNF-materials in large–scale applications. It is, however, not clear how CNF pre-treatment processes and the extent of delamination of the CNFs affect water removal, drying, the mechanical, optical and barrier properties of films and coatings.

It is understood that the extent of delamination, or homogenization steps affect the CNF film properties. The evolution of the CNF film strength and the apparent nano-sized fraction of a carboxymethylated CNF system as a function the energy input during homogenization is illustrated in Fig. 7. As shown the strength properties level off at an energy input around 2000 kWh/tonne. The barrier properties appear, however, not to be as sensitive to the number of homogenization steps as the mechanical properties as has been shown by previous investigators.73,81,82) This observation may be attributed to the already well-delaminated state of the investigated CNF systems.

It is noted that the potential market to replace plastic packaging has been estimated by Cowie et al.8) to be around 4 million tonnes.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f006.jpg
Fig. 6.

CNF coatings on board materials. Note the small amount necessary for total surface coverage because of the excellent hold-out of CNF. From left to right: reference, 1 g/m2 and 1.8 g/m2 CNF applied onto the surface of the board.73)

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ktappi/2015-047-06/N0460470601/images/KTAPPI_2015_v47n6_5_f007.jpg
Fig. 7.

The evolution of the tensile strength and the nanosized fraction of CNF made from carboxymethylated pulp. Modified from Naderi et al.83)

3.6 Plastic packaging

Plastic packaging comprising plastic bags, bottles and containers are one of the major pollutants as their insignificant degradation leads to their accumulation in the biosphere. Hence, regulatory initiatives to reduce the fossil-based components in the materials or their total ban have started to create demand for sustainable alternatives. It can be envisaged that nanocellulosic materials can be part of the solution, either through their employment as strengthening additive or as a sustainable material for the production of packaging material. In this connection, it is noted that an industrially attractive method for the production of light-weight (0.004 g/cm3) NFC-based foams (which can potentially be a replacement for polystyrene-foams) was recently reported by Cervin et al.84) It is noted that Cowie et al.8) estimate the market value of nanocelluloses (by 2020) in plastic packaging application to be in the order of 4 million metric tonnes.

3.7 Automotive body components

Environmental concerns accompanied by governmental directives are the driving forces behind the development of fuel efficient vehicles and the replacement of their non-sustainable (e.g. fossil-based) components. A possible way to reach the requirements is by using composites, in which nanocellulosic materials can be a key component; acting by similar strengthening mechanisms as in cement applications.85,86)

According to Cowie et al.8), a 20% employment of nanocellulose-based composites, which according to the authors is a highly conservative estimation, leads to the global annual consumption of 4 million metric tonnes of nanocellulosic materials.

3.8 Outlook

It is important to realize that any market projections for CNF materials are associated with many immense uncertainties. The cost of production of CNF materials will be widely different for different applications. Certain applications such as a wet-end additive will not require the same properties as in high-end applications. The technical requirements of the CNF materials for different applications are often vaguely known and there is a lack of suitable characterization methodologies for CNFs. This means that it is difficult to come up with appropriate specifications on the property profiles for the various CNF materials. New types of CNF materials are also currently being developed and new types of raw materials are being investigated. It is obvious that there is not one preferred process or material suitable for all applications.

In low-end applications such as wet-end additions it is clear that there are technical challenges associated with dispersion, retention, dewatering and suitable paper chemistries with regard to their successful application. There is also a need for robust processing equipment suitable for large-scale application.

For other applications, such as coatings and films, CNF products with high solids content are required. However, they are difficult to obtain using the currently available communition equipment.

It is obvious that there are many different routes to commercial success, but considering the sheer number of actors in this field, there will be many interesting prospects for the future of CNF materials.

Literature Cited

1
A. D. French, N. R. Bertoniere, R. M. Brown, H. Chanzy, D. Gray, K. Hattori and W. Glasser, 3rd Ed. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science & Technology, 5, New York, USA. John Wiley & Sons. (2003)
2
T. A. Boden, G. Marland and R. J. Andres, Global, regional and national fossil-fuel carbon dioxide emissions, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. Carbon Dioxide Analysis Center, Oak Ridgec National Laboratory. (2010)
3
D. Klemm, F. Kramer, S. Moritz, T. Lindström, M. Ankerfors, D. Gray and A. Dorris, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials, 50(24); 5438-5466 (2011)10.1002/anie.201001273
4
R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen and J. Youngblood, Chemical Society Reviews, Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites, 40; 3941-3994 (2011)10.1039/c0cs00108b
5
A. Isogai, Journal of Wood Science, Wood nanocelluloses: Fundamentals and applications as new bio-based nanomaterials, 59(6); 449-459 (2013)10.1007/s10086-013-1365-z
6
A. Dufresne, Materials Today, Nanocellulose: A new ageless bionanomaterial, 16(6); 220-227 (2013)10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004
7
T. Lindström, C. Aulin, A. Naderi and M. Ankerfors, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, Microfibrillated cellulose, In, John Wiley & Sons. (2014)10.1002/0471440264.pst614
8
J. Cowie, E. M. Bilek, T. H. Wegner and J. A. Shatkin, Tappi Journal, Market projections of cellulose nanomaterial-enabled products - Part 2 Volume estimates, 13; 57-69 (2014)
9
A. F. Turbak, F. W. Snyder and K. R. Sandberg, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Applied Polymer Symposia, Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: Properties, uses and commercial potential, 37; 815-827 (1983)
10
F. W. Herrick, R. L. Casebier, J. K. Hamilton and K. R. Sandberg, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Applied Polymer Symposia, Microfibrillated cellulose: Morphology and accessibility, 37; 797-813 (1983)
11
T. Lindström and L. Winter, Mikrofibrillär cellulosa som komponent vid papper-stillverkning, STFI internal report C159 (1988)
12
Ö. Eriksen, K. Syverud and Ö. Gregerson, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, The use of microfibrillataed cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper, 23(2); 299-304 (2008)10.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-03-p299-304
13
K. Spence, R. Venditti, O. Rojas, Y. Habibi and J. Pawlak, Cellulose, A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods, 18(4); 1097-1111 (2011)10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z
14
R. J. Kerekes and C. J. Schell, Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, Characterization of fiber flocculation regimes by a crowding factor, 18(1); J32-J38 (1992)
15
E. Horvath and T. Lindström, Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, The influence of colloidal interactions on fibre network strength, 309; 511-517 (2007)10.1016/j.jcis.2006.08.066
16
M. Ankerfors and T. Lindström, Method for providing nanocellulose comprising modified cellulose fibers, Patent (2009)
17
A. Naderi, T. Lindström, J. Sundström, T. Pettersson, G. Flodberg and J. Erlandsson, Cellulose, Microfluidized carboxymethyl cellulose modified pulp: A nanofibrillated cellulose system with some attractive properties, 22(2); 1159-1173 (2015)10.1007/s10570-015-0577-3
18
J. A. Walecka, Tappi Journal, An investigation of low degree of substitution carboxymethylcellulose, 39(7); 458-463 (1956)
19
A. Isogai, T. Saito and H. Fukuzumi, Nanoscale, TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers, 3(1); 71-85 (2011)10.1039/C0NR00583E
20
A. E. J. De Nooy, A. C. Besemer and H. Van Bekkum, Carbohydrate Polymers, Highly selective nitroxyl radical-mediated oxidation of primary alcohol groups in water-soluble glucans, 49; 397-406 (1995)10.1016/0008-6215(94)00343-e
21
P. L. Bragd, A. C. Besemer and H. Van Bekkum, Carbohydrate Polymers, Bromide-free TEMPO-mediated oxidation of primary alcohol groups in starch and methyl α-D-glucopyranoside, 328; 355-363 (2002)10.1016/S0008-6215(00)00109-9
22
P. L. Bragd, H. Van Bekkum and A. C. Besemer, Top Catalysis, TEMPO-mediated oxidation of polysaccharides, 27; 49-66 (2004)10.1023/B:TOCA.0000013540.69309.46
23
T. Saito, M. Hirota, H. Fukuzumi, N. Tamura, L. Heux, S. Kimura and A. Isogai, Biomacromolecules, Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions, 10(7); 1992-1996 (2009)10.1021/bm900414t
24
R. Tanaka, T. Saito and A. Isogai, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Cellulose nanofibrils prepared from softwood cellulose by TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO(2) systems in water at pH 4.8 or 6.8, 51(3); 228-234 (2012)10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.05.016
25
M. Henriksson, G. Henriksson, L. A. Berglund and T. Lindström, European Polymer Journal, An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibres, 43(8); 3434-3441 (2007)10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038
26
M. Ankerfors, T. Lindström and G. Henriksson, Method for the manufacture of microfibrillated cellulose, US Pat. (2007)
27
M. Pääkkö, M. Ankerfors, H. Kosonen, A. Nykänen, S. Ahola, M. Österberg, J. Ruokolainen, J. Laine, P. T. Larsson, O. Ikkala and T. Lindström, Biomacromolecules, Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels, 8(6); 1934-1941 (2007)10.1021/bm061215p
28
T. Taniguchi, Seni Kikai Gakkaishi, A microfibrillated method of natural fibres, 52; 119-123 (1996)10.2115/fiber.52.P119
29
T. Taniguchi, Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Microfibrillation of natural fibrous materials, 45(4); 472-473, (Japan) (1996)
30
K. Abe, S. Iwamoto and H. Yano, Biomacromolecules, Obtaining cellulose nanofibres with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood, 8; 3276-3278 (2007)10.1021/bm700624p
31
A. Chakraborty, M. Sain and M. Kortschot, Holzforschung, Cellulose microfibrils: A novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing, 59; 102-107 (2005)10.1515/HF.2005.016
32
B. Wang and M. Sain, Polymer International, Dispersion of soybean stock-based nanofiber in a plastic matrix, 56(4); 538-546 (2007)10.1002/pi.2167
33
B. Wang, M. Sain and K. Oksman, Applied Composite Materials, Study of structural morphology of hemp fiber from the micro to the nanoscale, 14(2); 89-103 (2007)10.1007/s10443-006-9032-9
34
H. P. Zhao, X. Q. Feng and H. Gao, Applied Physics Letters, Ultrasonic technique for extracting nanofibers from nature materials, 90(7), 073112 (2007)10.1063/1.2450666
35
K. Suzuki, H. Okumura, K. Kitagawa, S. Sato, A. N. Nakagaito and H. Yano, Cellulose, Development of continuous process enabling nanofibrillation of pulp and melt compounding, 20; 201-210 (2013)10.1007/s10570-012-9843-9
36
A. F. Turbak, F. W. Snyder and K. R. Sandberg, Food products containing microfibrillated cellulose, US Pat. (1982)
37
A. F. Turbak, F. W. Snyder and K. R. Sandberg, Suspensions containing microfibrillated cellulose, US Pat. (1984)
38
A. Naderi, T. Lindström and T. Pettersson, Cellulose, The state of carboxymethylated nanofibrils after homogenization-aided dilution from concentrated suspensions: A rheological perspective, 21(4); 2357-2368 (2014)10.1007/s10570-014-0329-9
39
R. Tanaka, T. Saito, D. Ishii and A. Isogai, Cellulose, Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement, 21(3); 1581-1589 (2014)10.1007/s10570-014-0196-4
40
M. Adam and M. Delsanti, Journal de Physique, Viscosity and longest relaxation time of semi-dilute polymer solutions. I. Good solvent, 44; 1185-1193 (1983)10.1051/jphys:0198300440100118500
41
M. Iotti, Ø. W. Gregersen, S. Moe and M. Lenes, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions, 19(1); 137-145 (2011)10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2
42
E. Lasseuguette, D. Roux and Y. Nishiyama, Cellulose, Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp, 15(3); 425-433 (2007)10.1007/s10570-007-9184-2
43
A. Okiyama, M. Motoki and S. Yamanaka, Food Hydrocolloids, Bacterial cellulose IV. Application to processed foods, 6; 503-511 (1993)10.1016/S0268-005X(09)80074-X
44
M. Iotti, Coating composition of nano cellulose, its uses and method for its manufacture, Pat. (2014)
45
T. Koskinen, H. Gustafsson and J. E. Teirfolk, A method and an apparatus for adding an additive to a cement-like composition, Pat. (2012)
46
A. Naderi, T. Lindström and ed M. D. I. H. Mondal, Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Synthesis, Modification and Applications, Rheological measurements on nanofibrillated cellulose systems: A science in progress; 187-202, In, New York. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. (2015)
47
A. Naderi and T. Lindström, Cellulose, Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: Effect of monovalent electrolytes on the rheological properties, 21(5); 3507-3514 (2014)10.1007/s10570-014-0394-0
48
S. Peters, T. Rushing, E. Landis and T. Cummins, Transportation Research Record, Nanocellulose and microcellulose fibers for concrete, 2142; 25-28 (2010)10.3141/2142-04
49
K. M. Stephenson, Characterizing the behavior and properties of nano cellulose reinforced ultra high performance concrete, Orono, ME, USA. University of Maine. (2011)
50
Y. Cao, P. Zavaterri, J. Youngblood, R. Moon and J. Weiss, Cement and Concrete Composites, The influence of cellulose nanocrystal additions on the performance of cement paste, 56; 73-83 (2015)10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.008
51
A. Laukkanen, J. E. Teirfolk, J. Salmela and M. Lille, Agent and composition for oilfield applications, Pat. (2011)
52
V. Lafitte, J. C. Lee, S. G. James, J. F. Del Valle, A. V. Yakovlev, M. K. Panga and G. H. Szabo, Fluids and methods including nanocellulose, US Pat. (2015)
53
M. H. de Oliviera, M. Maric and T. G. M. van de Ven, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, The role of fiber entanglement in the strength of wet papers, 23(4); 426-430 (2008)
54
J. Su, W. K. Mosse, S. Sharman, W. J. Batchelor and G. Garnier, Cellulose, Effect of tethered and free microfilbrillated cellulose (MFC) on the properties of paper composites, 20(4); 1925-1935 (2013)
55
T. Taipale, M. Österberg, A. Nykänen, J. Ruokolainen and J. Laine, Cellulose, Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength, 17(5); 1005-1020 (2010)10.1007/s10570-010-9431-9
56
C. Hii, Ø. W. Gregersen, G. Chinga-Carrasco and Ø. Eriksen, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, The effect of MFC on the pressability and paper properties of TMP and GCC based sheets, 27(2); 388-396 (2012)10.3183/NPPRJ-2012-27-02-p388-396
57
J. Rantanen and T. Maloney, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, Press dewatering and nip rewetting of paper containing nano-and microfibril cellulose, 28(4); 582-587 (2013)10.3183/NPPRJ-2013-28-04-p582-587
58
I. Kajanto and M. Kosonen, The Journal of Science & Technology for Forest Products and Processes, The potential use of micro-and nano-fibrillated cellulose as a reinforcing element in paper, 2(6); 42-48 (2012)
59
S. Paunonen, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, Strength and barrier enhancements of composites and packaging boards by nanocelluloses - A literature review, 28(2); 165-181 (2013)
60
F. W. Brodin, Ø. W. Gregersen and K. Syverud, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, Cellulose nanofibrils: Challenges and possibilities as a paper additive or coating material – A review, 29(1); 156-166 (2014)10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p156-166
61
S. Ahola, M. Österberg and J. Laine, Cellulose, Cellulose nanofibrils-adsorption with poly(amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive, 15(2); 303-314 (2008)10.1007/s10570-007-9167-3
62
D. Da Silva Perez, S. Tapin-Lingua, A. Lavalette, T. Barbosa, I. Gonzalez, G. Siqueira, J. Bras and A. Dufresne, Impact of micro/nanofibrillated cellulose preparation on the reinforcement properties of paper and composite filmsInternational Conference on Nanotechnology for the Forest Products Industry, Espoo, Finland; 711-730 (2010)
63
H. S. Osong, S. Norgren and P. Engstrand, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, Paper strength improvement by inclusion of nano-ligno-cellulose to chemi-thermomechanical pulp, 29(2); 309-316 (2014)10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-02-p309-316
64
M. Manninen, I. Kajanto, J. Happonen and J. Paltakari, Nordic Pulp and Paper Reserach Journal, The effect of microfibrillated cellulose addition on drying shrinkage and dimensional stability of wood-free paper, 26(3); 297-305 (2011)10.3183/NPPRJ-2011-26-03-p297-305
65
I. González, S. Boufi, M. A. Pélach, M. Alcalá, F. Vilaseca and P. Mutjé, BioResources, Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps, 7(4); 5167-5180 (2012)
66
I. González, F. Vilaseca, M. Alcalá, M. A. Pèlach, S. Boufi and P. Mutjé, Cellulose, Effect of the combination of biobeating and NFC on the physico-mechanical properties of paper, 20(3); 1425-1435 (2013)
67
P. R. Charani, M. Dehgani-Firouzabadi, E. Afra, Å. Blademo, A. Naderi and T. Lindström, Cellulose, Production of microfibrillated cellulose from unbleached kraft pulp of kenaf and Scotch pine and its effect on the properties of hardwood kraft: Microfibrillated cellulose paper, 20(5); 2559-2567 (2013)
68
S. R. D. Petroudy, K. Syverud, G. Chinga-Carrasco, A. Ghasemain and H. Resalati, Carbohydrate Polymers, Effects of bagasse microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyacrylamide on key properties of bagasse paper, 99; 311-318 (2014)
69
P. Hellström, A. Heijnesson-Hultén, M. Paulsson, H. Håkansson and U. Germgård, Cellulose, The effect of Fenton chemistry on the properties of microfibrillated cellulose, 21; 1489-1503 (2014)
70
R. Guimond, B. Chabot, K. N. Law and C. Daneault, Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, The use of cellulose nanofibres in papermaking, 36(1-2); 55-61 (2010)
71
K. Syverud and P. Stenius, Cellulose, Strength and barrier properties of MFC films, 16(1); 75-85 (2009)10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2
72
H. Fukuzumi, T. Saito, T. Iwata, Y. Kumamoto and A. Isogai, Biomacromolecules, Transparent and, 10(1); 162-165 (2009)
73
C. Aulin, M. Gällstedt and T. Lindström, Cellulose, Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings, 17(3); 559-574 (2010)10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y
74
C. Aulin, T. Lindström and ed D. Plackett, Biopolymers-New Materials for Sustainable Films and Coatings, Biopolymer coatings for paper and paperboard; 255-276, In, Chichester, Sussex, UK. John Wiley & Sons. (2011)
75
N. Lavoine, I. Desloges, A. Dufresne and J. Bras, Carbohydrate Polymers, Microfibrillated cellulose - Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: A review, 90(2); 735-764 (2012)10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026
76
R. J. Ashley and ed J. Comyn, Polymer Permeability, Permeability of plastics packaging; 269-308, In, Ipswhich, UK. Chapman & Hall. (1985)
77
J. H. Han, A. Gennadios and ed J. H. Han, Innovations in Food Packaging, Edible films and coatings: A review; 239-262, In, New York, NY, USA. Elsevier Academic Press. (2005)
78
J. M. Krochta, D. R. Heldman and ed D. B. Lund, 2nd Ed. Handbook of Food Engineering, Food packaging; 847-927, In, Boca Raton, FL, USA. CRC Press LLC. (2007)
79
K. Kinnunen, T. Hjelt, E. Kentta and U. Forsstrom, PaperCon 2013, Thin coatings for paper by foam coatings; 213-225, In, Atalanta, GE, USA. Tappi Press. (2013)
80
H. Song, M. Anderfors, M. Hoc and T. Lindström, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, Reduction of the linting and dusting propensity of newspaper using starch and microfibrillated cellulose, 25(4); 495-504 (2010)10.3183/NPPRJ-2010-25-04-p495-504
81
C. Aulin, J. Netrval, L. Wågberg and T. Lindström, Soft Matter, Aerogels from nanofibrillated cellulose with tunable oleophobicity, 6; 3298-3305 (2010)10.1039/c001939a
82
I. Siró, D. Plackett, M. Hedenqvist, M. Ankerfors and T. Lindström, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: The effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties, 119(5); 2652-2660 (2011)
83
A. Naderi, T. Lindström and J. Sundström, Cellulose, Repeated homogenization, a route for decreasing the energy consumption in the manufacturing process of carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose?, 22(2); 1147-1157 (2015)10.1007/s10570-015-0576-4
84
N. T. Cervin, L. Andersson, J. B. S. Ng, P. Olin, L. Bergström and L. Wågberg, Biomacromolecules, Lightweight and strong cellulose materials made from aqueous foams stabilized by nanofibrillated cellulose, 14(2); 503-511 (2013)10.1021/bm301755u
85
S. J. Eichhorn, A. Dufresne, M. Aranguren, N. E. Marcovich, J. R. Capadona, S. J. Rowan, C. Weder, W. Thielemans, M. Roman, S. Renneckar, W. Gindl, S. Veigel, J. Keckes, H. Yano, K. Abe, M. Nogi, A. N. Nakagaito, A. Mangalam, J. Simonsen, A. S. Benight, A. Bismarck, L. A. Berglund and T. Peijs, Journal of Materials Science, Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites, 45(1); 1-33 (2009)10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0
86
H. A. Khalil, A. H. Bhat and A. I. Yusra, Carbohydrate Polymers, Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review, 87(2); 963-979 (2012)
페이지 상단으로 이동하기